Natalia Lebedeva Biography

The list was prepared on the basis of information from the open sources of Lebedev, Natalya Valerievna Biography, the appointment of Angioline general director in June became known about the appointment of Natalia Lebedeva by the new General of the Angioline company. The change of chapter occurred against the backdrop of a corporate conflict within the manufacturer of medical devices for interventional cardiac surgery.

Earlier, the founders of Angiolina Andrei Kudryashov and Alexey French were excluded from the shareholders by decision of the Arbitration Court of the Novosibirsk Region. During the proceedings, the court considered that Kudryashov and the French did significant harm to the company during the corporate conflict in the years. She received promotions in return for investment in the year.

As the judges of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation considered, the deal wore signs of “mock” and pursued the ultimate goal in the form of the withdrawal of assets during a corporate conflict with another shareholder of the company - Natalya Lebedeva. In June, it became known that “angioline” stopped the release of medical devices for cardiac surgery.

According to Natalia Lebedeva, BFM-Novosibirsk contacted her, as a general director of the company, she will take up the restart of the enterprise in the next short time. She was detained as part of a criminal investigation on large -scale theft, instituted under the article of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The maximum punishment under this article provides for up to ten years in prison.

Lebedeva is one of the key figures in the corporate conflict within the company, which has been going on for several years. In April, the company's shareholder Maxim Zolotukhin and the company itself appealed to the Arbitration Court of the Novosibirsk Region with a request to recognize Lebedeva’s ownership of the Angioline shares invalid. The court granted the application and imposed on disputed actions, forbiding Lebedeva to make transactions with them.

Professional displays for medical institutions: as digital technologies improve the quality of patient service and the work of medical staff according to sources in law enforcement agencies, Lebedev is accused of assigning or embezzlement of someone else's property on an especially large scale. This step is a continuation of the corporate conflict, which began in the year, when Lebedeva challenged the additional ministry of the company, claiming that the decision was made without a quorum of shareholders.

Then the court sided with Lebedeva. In the year, she launched the production complex at the Biotechnopark site worth a million rubles. The company's products, including stents and catheters, are used in the diagnosis and treatment of heart and vessel diseases. House arrest is replaced by a ban on certain actions. According to Interfax, Lebedeva was under house arrest from June 20. The investigation petitioned for the extension of this measure, but the court decided to mitigate it.

She was charged under part 3 of the article of the Criminal Code of Russia, which provides for liability for appropriation or embezzlement. Lebedeva was detained in Moscow and later transferred to Novosibirsk. During the trials, the arbitration court of the region as interim measures arrested 47 thousand Lebedev previously declared readiness to resolve the dispute, including the possibility of acquiring shares from majority shareholders or redeeming their part of the business.

She also made the initiative to conduct a financial audit of the company before making decisions on further negotiations. One of the proposed options for resolving the conflict was the reduction in the authorized capital of the enterprise by repaying privileged shares. Earlier, the participants in the corporate dispute filed oncoming claims demanding to exclude each other from the shareholders.

Initially, the court granted Lebedeva’s claim, however, upon repeated consideration of the case in March of the year, the Arbitration Court of the Novosibirsk Region refused both parties to exclude. As a result, the structure of ownership remains the same.