Biography of Goryachev Ilya

May 6, Bourn, Ilya Goryachev, Russian opposition, Russia, Russian nationalists on May 7 in the Moscow City Court will begin the trial of Ilya Goryachev, the head of the Russian Image organization, whom the investigation accuses of involvement in the activities of the “combat organization of Russian nationalists”. Alexander Vasiliev, lawyer: - taking into account the fact that I consider Born the law enforcement agencies in many ways, I evaluate Goryachev’s involvement in its creation and leadership as a mystification of law enforcement agencies.

Vladimir Basmanov, one of the creators of D. And what happened came out. Today's process over Ilya Goryachev is another evidence that such an opinion, similar intentions that he was guided, are erroneous, that it is impossible to have any business with the Chekists or officials of the AP, otherwise it can end either with death in the Donbass in the Buryat detachment or a long, if not lifelong, conclusion for those who were mistaken.

Many Russian people in the past during the civil war made such mistakes, supporting the Communists, since they are strong, hoping "to remake everything later for the better, not so bad, many communists are also Russian people." It is impossible to beat the devil, he will eat you and will go further. I hope that Ilya will be able to get out of this situation with a free person, and in fact and in general, and draw the appropriate conclusions.

But maybe I'm an optimist. Alexey Baranovsky, journalist: - The whole story has long been from the plane of the political detective for a long time into the plane of political myths. The jury-offers will not just figure out all this. If there are no torpedoes in the collegium, then I expect that the People’s Court will decide everything in fairness. They will decide innocent - it means innocent, they will decide differently - it means differently.

The main question is: will the collegium in the case of Ilya Goryachev Chistoy or will gain “as usual”, as we have already seen ... Daniil Konstantinov, former political prisoner: “I did not know close to Ilya Goryachev and it is difficult for me to judge the accusations from him. Moreover, the “Bourn case” is semi -secret and no one wants to submit all the materials to the public, pulling out only “convenient” fragments for publication.

But something becomes clear from the recently completed process of Bablagin-Volkov. Firstly, this process was very reminiscent of the Stalinist processes, where the accused were recognized in all mortal sins and asked to punish them more than “I am guilty. I ask me to shoot me, ”which leads to very bad guesses. It is unlikely that a person voluntarily admits such crimes guaranteeing his life imprisonment.

And if not voluntarily, then how!? How did the confession in places of imprisonment turn out? Can they believe them? More questions arose from this process than answers ... Secondly, it is obvious that Tikhonov’s testimony and Hasis received in the camps should have been used against certain functionaries of the presidential administration and people close to them. That is, they were supposed to become an instrument of intra -elite showdowns, which in many ways levele them as evidence.

In general, I think that it will be possible to understand this issue only when an independent and fair court appears in Russia. At present, there is no need to count on a fair trial. He did not impress a person who could independently lead the fighters and people of action. Rather, Goryachev was and remained the theoretician, the editor of the magazine Serbian Cross.

Who needs to make him a terrorist? .. But it is worth noting that the Chechen militants, who killed much more than all the Russian nationalists taken, never judge so publicly, and the Russian media do not relish the sentences. Igor Garkavenko, philosopher, Ukrainian volunteer: - On this issue, only one thing can be said confidently - to all political prisoners of the current regime of the Russian Federation, a clear presumption of innocence should be applied by society.

Give an assessment, to understand, much less deciding fate - can and has the right to only “other regime”, and other people - for sure. There is no and cannot be everything that is happening in Russia today. Mikhail Polyakov, a fighter of the Azov battalion: - My answer is extremely simple and taxed: Goryachev, as a consistent adherent of Novorossiya, the Putin aggression in my country, if he had been in the wild, would be engaged in writing like Sipa and motivate all kinds of luck to go here to shoot here.

So let him roll to Ad. Vasily Kryukov, political officer: - I met Ilya Goryachev only a couple of times in Moscow many years ago, so I can make an opinion about his case only from open sources. The problem of his case is the excessive convergence of individual participants in the Russian Image project with the functionaries of the ideological apparatus of the Chekist regime of the Russian Federation.

This is a lesson for the future to all Russian nationalists. Although the lesson is not for the future - many even today are counting on the loyalty of the regime in themselves in the future, for small situational services now. This will not be evaluated.At some point, the ideologists of the Kremlin can give funds for the next “project”, give it to develop to a certain level, but they will never save and cover anyone, but on the contrary, they will punish as hard and indicative as possible, while every “project” will collapse immediately as it will be disconnected from the resources.

Every such project does not work for Russians, but for those who created these projects. Goryachev was allowed to leave the Russian Federation, but only for a while, until his figure was in demand by political strategists, and in the country from which colleagues of Russian special services will always be given. The Serbian-Magician border is not insurmountable-in this connection for me it is not clear why he remained on her side.

Apparently, he underestimated the threats, or hoped that they would be left alone ... regarding the legal prospects of the Goryachev case, without evaluating his moral aspects, and not knowing its actual content, it is puppy that the repressive apparatus of the Russian Federation is guaranteed to bring the case to the result required. Sergey Zhavoronkov, political scientist:-We are observing the sad and in a sense comic picture, when two people-Goryachev and Tikhonov-are judged, in fact, by cross-indications on each other, which have no documentary, actual evidence, in the spirit of the fact that "I heard him in the cafe said that he killed it." It is easy to understand that such indications can be obtained for each person, so you do not rush to condemn everyone in a lump.

As for the real, more or less proven cases of violence by some convicts in the Bourn case, it should be remembered that violence gives rise to violence. The impunity of ethnic gangs like “black hawks” aroused and will cause similar lynching. The best prevention of ultra -right extremism should be the adequate operation of the investigative and judicial system so that the killers are not exempted from liability by corrupt police officers or a court.

Alexei Chochnev, journalist: - I believed and I believe that the case of Tikhonov and Hasis Shito is white threads, and the investigation and the court were so that there was no trust in them. Such complex and resonant matters must be carried out so that the mosquito does not flow, and not at speed, just to please the indignant inhabitants. But this is not the case. Let me remind you that it all started with bags on the heads of the defendants right in the courtroom - during the first meeting.

You can already put an end to this.

Therefore, I will not draw conclusions about the court itself and the sentence. I will go to the case of Ilya Goryachev. I am not familiar with him, as well as with Hasis and Tikhonov. His role in the past process, it seems to me, was determined by investigators clearly: the main witness of the prosecution is in exchange for freedom. He agreed, but his conscience tortured. Next, we observed the battle of cowardice with a conscience.

In the upcoming court we will continue to observe this. The benefits of the upcoming court can only be if the conscience of Goryachev makes him tell us about the role in this case by Leonid Simunin, whom Goryachev called his curator from the presidential administration. Simunin is familiar to me, he was among those young people who several years ago participated in the attack with stones and bottles of Edward Limonov near the Tagan court.

The fight from the court caused a huge resonance, but in the end they put the National Bolsheviks, who repulsed the attackers. Simunin in that case was among the "victims" and witnesses of the prosecution. So, perhaps, we will learn more details, and most importantly, real guilty in political murders, and not performers or those who were forced to call them.

Whoever and who actually commanded and who killed him, if he killed at all [all the more so since there were probably no more people who want to say this and without me] - I did not hold a candle myself, I didn’t find out the truth on my own, I have no competent confidence in the default. Therefore, I perceive the current trial exclusively politically. And in the political sense, I can say - the state creates guided extremists only in order for the defeat of these structures to be a edification for extremists conditionally uncontrollable.

Here, Ilya Goryachev and everything that happens to him is given to us all, first of all, to edification. That is how this must be perceived. First of all. At the first level of perception ... there are a variety of fashionable glossy magazines with headings like “Rules of life”, “10 principles, how to live correctly”, in this sense, the political biography of Goryachev is an anti -Glara, a detailed illustrated catalog of how to live; What mistakes should not be made so that in the end you can’t be where Ilya Goryachev is now located and in addition with a completely destroyed reputation.It is all the more surprising that some “right -wing intellectuals”, using the armed conflict in certain areas of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions of Ukraine [I am not at all mocking, I just quote the “Minsk agreements”, written with the knowledge and approval of the leadership of unrecognized republics], it seems to be seriously intended to repeat the political biography of Goryachev in some fundamental points.

Stanislav Yakovleva, a fragment of which is presented here as a comment, read on the “Russian Monitor” tomorrow. The survey was carried out by the Department of Sociology and Polls there are no similar materials.