Olga Zaslavskaya biography

As Olga Vladimirovna recalls, at the age of 5 she clearly knew what would be a teacher of the Russian language and literature. As a child, she rehearsed in front of the mirror, how she would communicate with the class. Already becoming older, the daughter measured her actions with the reaction of their parents to them.

And they have always been the highest authority for her. Therefore, where to go, there was no doubt. Naturally in the Tula pedagogical. Olga Vladimirovna Moshkevich graduated from the Faculty of Philology in the city of these years taught her a blow, raised leadership qualities. And in the city of Olga Vladimirovna she went to work in the Yu Tula school as a teacher of Russian language and literature, in the year she became deputy director of this school for scientific and methodological work.

In between lessons and solving management problems, she was preparing to surrender a candidate minimum. Tula, where Olga Zaslavskaya worked in Lenin, Olga Vladimirovna defended her thesis. Olga Vladimirovna, subsequent to defend the dissertation of 25 years, worked at the Institute for Professional Qualification of Education of Education of the Tula Region: over the years she was the head of the department, vice -rector of the Institute for Scientific Work, and the scientific director of the institute.

The doctoral dissertations of Olga Vladimirovna Zaslavskaya and in the city of Zaslavskaya defended the dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences on the topic: "The learning process and its functions in the development of the educational system of the school." In general, the study is built in line with the theory of educational systems, developed by the group of education theory at the Institute of Theory and History of Pedagogy and Education RAO.

The fundamental idea of ​​this theory is the provision that the construction of a humanistic educational system is a condition for the personal development of students. Research methods: theoretical analysis of philosophical, psychological and pedagogical literature, modeling and experimental work, analysis and generalization of the experience of modern educational institutions, a monographic description of educational systems, the basis of self-development and functioning of which was the learning process, presented in the activities of schools of various types.

Tula, Novomoskovskaya city gymnasium. In Olga Vladimirovna, the scientific title of professor was awarded. In gg. Zaslavskaya led the Russian-Canadian project dedicated to the civil education of schoolchildren. As an invited professor, she worked in the US Olbani at the College of St. Today O. Zaslavskaya is the head of the Department of Theory and Methods of Education of Tula State University.

Tula State University. Ushinsky for research in the field of vocational education. Professor Zaslavskaya is loved and respected by colleagues and students just like her parents. Zaslavskaya Chve. What, in general, it seems to you, the personal meaning of education, development, gaining new knowledge? Education is a unique resource of personality formation. These two processes are interconnected.

As long as education continues, the formation of personality lasts. A person educated is more stable and is less amenable to spontaneous or purposeful influence. This is the valuable quality of a person in a world where manipulation is sometimes the only tool for influencing people. Education allows us to form our personal plan and follow it. It helps to identify our genuine capabilities in transforming ourselves and the world around us.

Strictly speaking, education cannot be “obtained”, it can only be “received”: any stop here means regression, the movement is back. Getting an education means working for yourself. A man in a sense is a terrible egoist in a sense: he constantly needs to draw new knowledge to assign them to himself. There is no more honest way of personal enrichment than obtaining education. Who understood this, felt the pleasure of the process of knowledge, he will never stop.

So education is an increase in personal structures that help us ensure the well -being and stability in the world of people, phenomena and events. Does adults have a “built -in” need for development, which only needs to be realized? Or far from everyone has such a need? The same number of adults every morning wakes up with the thought of the need to learn something new.

But many people are aware of the need for education, perhaps the majority. Further, much depends on the living conditions, on significant others, on circumstances. The awareness of the need for education to one degree or another in normal people is a kind of starting motive. It is very important in the child to develop a living individual need to “form”. Pedagogy claims that the qualitative result of education cannot be obtained outside of two situations: outside the situation of interest and outside the situation.

A teacher, a university teacher, in general, a mentor in the broad sense of the word, who knows how to provide these situations for his students, can motivate many, many to receive and continue education.The slogan “Studying - hard work” does not contribute to the formation of such motivation in either children or adults. What is the difference between "children's" and "adult" education?

There are much fewer differences than it seems. Basically, they lie in the field of teaching and development of those who study - the choice of ways and ways to solve the pedagogical problem. But the basic laws of the pedagogical process, its internal logic remain uniform and indivisible in any case: the teachings of both the child and the adult should act as a form of life, as a way of mastering culture, as a source of various real life experience, is carried out in the form of educational activity, etc.

Self -education is another absolutely wonderful thing, but not everyone can do this consistently and purposefully engage in, it requires a high level of development of personal structures. What place does the advanced training system occupy in education for adults? The continuing education system is my favorite place in the space of education. The main goal of the system of advanced training, in my opinion, should be the formation of a professional culture of a person.

Universities teach the "ABC" of the profession, the task of the system of advanced training is to teach to work with professional "texts". Professional culture is, first of all, the ability to think correctly, to think exactly in the direction where all the main answers to all the main questions of professional life and being are. Those who are aware of the objective and subjective in their profession understand what patterns determine the productive movement to the result of professional activity.

Those who understand the world of profession as a system, and themselves - as part of this system and have no doubt that his relationship with the world of profession is systemic in nature. A lot of people who want to come to a professional and tell him “how to do” “how to sit down,” I. often said a meeting with such advisers to a person in great danger-to become an object of someone's manipulation.

This is indecent and insulting for anyone who respects the profession in themselves and themselves in the profession. To improve the qualifications of an adult, an employee means teaching him to think correctly. In practical terms, we are talking about the need to change the instructive-methodical approach to improving the professional qualification of personnel to the worldview, cultural.

The teacher-philosopher Sergei Iosifovich Gessen at the beginning of the last century formulated the main goal of education as the task of "turning a natural person-into cultural." Well, in application to the process of improving the professional qualifications of specialists about this, in fact, should be discussed. Will the society be developed, conscious, knowing people more humane and fair?

Or are education education in no way connected? Yes, it will be. Pedagogy is generally optimistic of such a science. She believes in the inescapable capabilities of a person and the enormous potentials of an educating-developing education. Correctly thinking, that is, good teachers, it turns out excellent. I am convinced that the society of educated people is more humane and fair.

Educated people are other employees, other citizens, and other parents. With the correct setting of the case, education can and should give a person the ability to think, understanding of the laws of world order, productive experience in different fields of activity and relations. Smart, active, intelligently thinking more easily and faster will find the way to professional success, public recognition, harmonious and well -maintained life - that is, fortunately.

You know, when I was a teacher, I said at the beginning of the lesson to the guys: “You will become more than 45 minutes, which means 45 minutes smarter, because the education nourishes the mind, which means 45 minutes free, because the smart person is really free, and therefore 45 minutes happier, because only a free person is happy. In short, the main thing: you will become 45 minutes happier.

” It seems to me that in this, in fact, the purpose of education is to teach a person to be happy. By the way, I note that a person is educated and borsch is better! Indeed, here, as in any business, it is necessary to own a set of complex intellectual operations - analysis, synthesis, the ability to classify, systematize, predict, etc. Where do they come from, these skills?

From education. What are the requirements for our development? Where do we need to develop, what qualities to “pump” to be ready for it? Society will need people with a good internal “reinforcement”, with a built culture of thinking, a culture of communication, with a developed system of interests. In the future, I am sure that civilized and free people will be in demand.

Education produces free people.Simplifying, vulgarizing the meaning and essence of educational tasks, reducing them to something very specific, applied, exclusively functional, the state and society make it difficult or simply impossible to create civil society, the development of society as a space of culture, free development and fair structure. After all, a public school is able to grow not subjects, but citizens - and this, in my opinion, is much more profitable for the state, only it does not seem to understand this.

In conclusion, we suggest watching a small video with Professor Zaslavskaya.